14 words - We must secure the existence of our race and a future for White children.
The war against Whites has cost millions of our people their future. As the destruction of our people becomes more effective, Whites are fighting harder to survive.
Here is a list of the players in approximate order of power
The Elite - Extremely anti-White
They control the flow of money, and are able to appoint their people to the highest positions of power. They influence politics, treaty’s, law, war and trade. Some of the elite are worth more than small countries. They use money to control main stream media, governments, education and the entertainment industry. Their motivation? Suggestions are power, sex, money, devil worship and Zionism. The highest level of the war on Whites is a propaganda war waged against us by the elites.
Intellectuals - pro-White
Gifted, clever and courageous, many have put themselves in harms way or sacrificed an easy living to tell the truth and expose the contradictions of the anti-White system the elite impose on us.
Anti-White liberals and conservatives
White Liberals are the most pathetic type within this group. For them anti-White Political Correctness is a religion. As a group they tend towards the following characteristics - snobby, over educated, brainwashed, elitist, cowardly, bullying, domineering and self hatred. The Politically Correct have run oppressive regimes and Witch Hunts throughout history. They are often found in the very Whitest of neighbourhoods or social groups. Many liberals are rejecting their brainwashing and becoming active and excellent members of the pro-White movement. Studies have shown the group most susceptible to propaganda are young White University students, this fits one of the stereotypes for the Politically Correct. Anti-White conservatives are in it for themselves, cheap labour, profits, career etc.
Main stream pro-Whites
They have arrived late to the battle, and are only doing well in Europe. Perhaps the most notable examples are the National Front in France and the PEGIDA movement in Germany. This group is rising rapidly in strength.
Immigrants - anti-White
They are given special protection by the elites, and as their numbers grow, they dominate former White homelands.
Will it kill us or cure us of our apathy? That depends on how Whites react to this threat.
Keyboard warriors - pro-White
Powerful because of their numbers and the high standard of their activism. Somewhere along the way they have moved on from the pathetic infighting amongst each other on the finer points of nationalism, and are now to be found thrashing anti-Whites in the comments section of thousands of articles, and even getting their message out on to the street and collaborating with the intellectuals and the pro-White groups. The Elite appear to be desperate to control the internet as it is a powerful threat to their mainstream media.
For example RWR or the Celtics. Some mainstream Whites complain that because of the image they project they do more harm than good. These groups are damaged from the billions of dollars the elite has spent on propaganda and hatred against them. Their members tend to be courageous, heroic, accustomed to violence, conservative and from the working class or poor. Despite their small numbers these groups combined have a great depth and strength to them, and are the foundation of an international network of resistance against the Elite.
The Sheeple (those who follow)
Teachers, professors, politicians, the wealthy, the famous, artists, musicians and the great bulk of the White population.
Sex gangs are continuing to prey on vulnerable young girls in Rotherham despite last year’s damning revelations of systemic and sustained abuse of more than 1,400 girls, the town’s MP has claimed.
Sarah Champion, the town’s Labour MP since 2012, has revealed recent publicity had prompted many women to come forward to speak to her about how they had been abused, with around 10 percent of them describing new incidents.
It comes just weeks after a criminal investigation was launched into a damning new report that found Rotherham Council was ‘not fit for purpose’ and still ‘in denial’ about the 1,400 young girls who were abused in the town over 16 years.
Investigators concluded girls as young as 11 were left to be abused by non-White men between 1997 and 2013 because the council’s staff and politicians feared being labelled racist.
Ms Champion told The Times: ‘It is still going on, absolutely.
‘It’s usually young women who’ve read about this and recognised that this is what happened to them, but it’s also young girls who are still involved.
‘They’re scared, they don’t know what to do and they’re asking for advice.’
The MP has been vocal in her condemnation of South Yorkshire Police and the Rotherham Council’s past conduct.
This, she told the paper, had led to her becoming a target of intimidation within her own party, and she claimed there were people trying to bully and undermine her, as well as campaign against her.
The abuse scandal in Rotherham is considered one of the worst in Britain’s history with experts estimating that 1,400 girls fell into the clutches of paedophiles.
The damning report, released earlier this month, was written by Louise Casey, director-general for troubled families at the government’s Communities Department.
She found the council had a ‘deep-rooted’ culture of sexism and bullying where it would ‘shoot the messenger’ and sought to force whistleblowers into silence or pay them off.
Inspectors also found the council ‘goes to some lengths to cover up information’ and said that children in the town were still at risk of abuse.
A council researcher claimed files detailing failures in tackling abuse in the town were stolen from her office and never recovered.
A report by Professor Alexis Jay last August revealed how some 1,400 vulnerable girls had been subjected to rape, violence and trafficking by gangs of mainly Asian men in Rotherham (pictured) between 1997 and 2013
In October 2014 a Home Affairs Select Committee report called for an urgent investigation into the allegation.
The committee added that the council and South Yorkshire Police ignored ‘compelling evidence’ about the scale of the abuse.
The report said South Yorkshire Police also failed in its role to protect victims, turning a blind eye to their plight and in many cases holding them responsible.
Police were said to be aware that a victim was ‘raped with a broken bottle’ and some girls were ‘ordered to kiss perpetrators’ feet at gun point’ but never took any action.
In one case an officer told a victim: ‘Don’t worry- you aren’t the first girl to be raped by XX and you won’t be the last’.
According to Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.”
Four people were convicted of killing her.:17–18In 1998, all were pardoned by South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission when they stated that their actions had been politically motivated.
Biehl’s family supported the release of the men,:71 and her father shook their hands, stating:
The most important vehicle of reconciliation is open and honest dialogue … we are here to reconcile a human life which was taken without an opportunity for dialogue. When we are finished with this process we must move forward with linked arms.
(Breitbart) - Former film star Brigitte Bardot, France’s iconic blonde bombshell and “sex kitten” who reigned supreme from 1952 - 1973, is currently on trial for the fifth time for insulting Muslims and “inciting racial hatred.” Bardot has been fined four times and has also received suspended jail sentences.
Now, the prosecutor, Anne de Fontette, wants a heftier fine and a tougher sentence: the equivalent of $24,000 and a two month (hopefully) suspended jail term.
What crimes has Bardot committed in the land without a First Amendment, in the land ofHate Speech laws that are being slickly exploited by non-persecuted Muslims?
Bardot has written: “I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country.”
Bardot, seventy nine, is an avid animal rights activist and abhors the slaughter of animals for any purpose, including religious ones. But mainly, she laments “the Islamization of France.”
In 1997, Bardot was convicted of “inciting racial hatred” by publishing an Open Letter in the French Daily, Le Figaro; she complained of “foreign over-population,” mostly by Muslim families.
In 1998, Bardot was again convicted for “decrying the loss of French identity and tradition due to the ‘multiplication of mosques while our church bells fall silent for want of priests.’”
In 2000, Bardot was again convicted for what she wrote in her book Pluto’s Square, which featured a chapter in which she grieved for “my country, my homeland, my land is again invaded by an overpopulation of foreigners, especially Muslims.”
In 2004, in another book, A Cry in the Silence, Bardot ran afoul of the political correctniks by “generally associating Islam with the 9/11 terror attacks and denouncing the ‘Islamization of France’ by people she described as ‘invaders.’ She also wrote: “Over the last twenty years, we have given in to a subterranean, dangerous, and uncontrolled infiltration, which not only resists adjusting to our laws and customs but which will, as the years pass, attempt to impose its own.”
Bardot has written what the late, great Oriana Fallaci once wrote-for which she, too, was sued in both France and Italy.
Bardot has written what the great Jean Raspail once wrote in his 1973 brilliant dystopian novel In the Camp of the Saints.
Bardot has written what the prescient and indomitable scholar Bat Ye’or has written in her 2005 book Eurabia. The Euro-Arab Axis and in her 2011 book Europe, Globalization, And the Coming Universal Caliphate.
ISIS threatens to send 500,000 migrants to Europe as a ‘psychological weapon’ in chilling echo of Gaddafi’s prophecy that the Mediterranean ‘will become a sea of chaos’
Italian press today published claims that ISIS has threatened to release the huge wave of migrants to cause chaos in Europe if they are attacked
And letters from jihadists show plans to hide terrorists among refugees
In 2011, Muammar Gaddafi ominously predicted war would come to Libya
He was deposed in a violent coup and killed in October of the same year
ISIS has threatened to flood Europe with half a million migrants from Libya in a ‘psychological’ attack against the West, it was claimed today.
Transcripts of telephone intercepts published in Italy claim to provide evidence that ISIS is threatening to send 500,000 migrants simultaneously out to sea in hundreds of boats in a ‘psychological weapon’ against Europe if there is military intervention against them in Libya.
Many would be at risk of drowning with rescue services unable to cope. But authorities fear that if numbers on this scale arrived, European cities could witness riots.
Separately, the militants hope to cement their control of Libya then cross the Mediterranean disguised as refugees, according to letters seen by Quilliam the anti-terror group, reported by the Telegraph.
Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa.
Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should, however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as Swedes.
In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to have sex with six, seven or eight men.
The internet radio station Granskning Sverige called the mainstream newspapers Aftonposten and Expressen to ask why they had described the perpetrators as “Swedish men” when they actually were Somalis without Swedish citizenship. They were hugely offended when asked if they felt any responsibility to warn Swedish women to stay away from certain men. One journalist asked why that should be their responsibility.
According to figures published by The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet; known as Brå) — an agency under the Ministry of Justice — 29,000 Swedish women, during 2011, reported that they had been raped (which seems to indicate that less than 25% of the rapes are reported to the police).
Since 2000, there has only been one research report on immigrant crime. It was done in 2006 by Ann-Christine Hjelm from Karlstads University. It emerged that in 2002, 85% of those sentenced to at least two years in prison for rape in Svea Hovrätt, a court of appeals, were foreign born or second-generation immigrants.
A 1996 report by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention reached the conclusion that immigrants from North Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia) were 23 times as likely to commit rape as Swedish men. The figures for men from Iraq, Bulgaria and Romania were, respectively, 20, 18 and 18. Men from the rest of Africa were 16 times more prone to commit rape; and men from Iran, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, 10 times as prone as Swedish men.
This month, all major Swedish media reported on a brutal gang rape on board the Finnish Ferry Amorella, running between Stockholm and Åbo in Finland. Big headlines told the readers that the perpetrators were Swedish:
“Several Swedish Men Suspected of Rape on the Finland Ferry” (Dagens Nyheter).
“Six Swedish Men Raped Woman in Cabin” (Aftonbladet).
“Six Swedes Arrested for Rape on Ferry” (Expressen).
“Eight Swedes Suspected of Rape on Ferry” (TT - the Swedish News Agency).
On closer inspection, it turned out that seven of the eight suspects were Somalis and one was Iraqi. None of them had Swedish citizenship, so they were not even Swedish in that sense. According to witnesses, the group of men had been scouring the ferry looking for sex. The police released four of them (but they are still suspects) whereas four (all Somalis) remain in custody.
As predicted, the nightmare of Ethnic / Muslim offenders forcing young White girls into sex slavery keeps getting bigger in Britain.
In what police say is the largest child sexual exploitation (CSE) investigation in the country - bigger than high profile cases in Rochdale and Rotherham - the men face a combined total of 59 charges, including rape, sexual activity with a child under 16 and trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation. This time it is in the city of Halifax that these anti-White hate crimes are being uncovered.
Our government pushes White Genocide using ‘The NZ Diversity Action Programme: Te Ngira’
Here is how Te Ngira describes itself, but what it is doing is setting up NZ for the racial disasters that go with multiculturalism;
The New Zealand Diversity Action Programme brings together organisations taking practical initiatives to:
·recognise and celebrate the cultural diversity of our society (diverse)
·promote the equal enjoyment by everyone of their civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, regardless of race, colour, religion, ethnicity or national origin(equal)
·foster harmonious relations between diverse peoples(harmonious)
·fulfill the promise of the Treaty of Waitangi(Treaty-based)
This is a list of key dates and public events that are widely celebrated in New Zealand. These provide opportunities to acknowledge diversity in the workplace, schools, the media and the community. A number of Diversity Action Programme participants use these occasions as a starting point for scheduling events, celebrations and diversity projects.
·Waitangi Day: 6 February 2014
·Chinese New Year: 31 January 2014
·Race Relations Day: 21 March 2014
·NZ Sign Language Week : 12-18 May 2014
·Samoan Language Week: 26-30 May 2014
·World Refugee Day: 20 June 2014
·Mātāriki: 28 June 2014
·Māori Language Week: 21-27 July 2014
·NZ Diversity Forum: TBC
·Islam Awareness Week: TBC
·Diwali: 23 October 2014
Diversity is Death and White Genocide for Denmark
(Reuters) - Police shot dead a 22-year-old Danish-born gunman on Sunday after he killed two people at a Copenhagen synagogue and an event promoting free speech in actions possibly inspired by an attack on the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, authorities said.
Spy chief Jens Madsen said the gunman was known to intelligence services prior to the shooting and had probably acted alone. Police said he had a record of violence, gang-related activities and weapons possession.
Two civilians - a synagogue guard and a film-maker - were killed and five police were wounded in the two separate attacks in the Danish capital on Saturday and Sunday.
Witnesses said the gunman had fired up to 40 shots at a cafe hosting a free speech event with Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who has received death threats for depicting the head of the Prophet Mohammad on a dog.
The gunman then moved on to a nearby synagogue where the guard, protecting a young girl’s confirmation, was gunned down.
Liberal reporter starts to wake up to the anti-White narrative, he writes as follows;
My political consciousness is very much a product of the PC age. I grew up with all the urban legends. The subliminal racism of black binliners. The sexism of the Famous Five. Tufty the Squirrel’s elitism. And I laughed at the foolishness of it, along with everyone else.
But I also cringed at the casual “mind your language” style racism and sexism prevalent at that time. And I was glad that it was finally becoming socially unacceptable to hide prejudice behind a veneer of humour.
The leaders and officers of Rotherham council were not banning binliners. Or removing Enid Blyton from their libraries. They were standing back and watching while children were raped, abducted, beaten and trafficked around the country as sex slaves. And they were standing back because the victims were white and the rapists were not.
“The views expressed by Commenters and Guest Writers on this Blog and Website may not reflect the views of the NZ National Front – however we stand for freedom of speech and the inalienable rights of New Zealanders to hold and express their opinions. People have a clear choice whether or not to view this Website and the Comments Blog – the NZ National Front respectfully suggests that people exercise that choice without judgement… particularly if the views held and expressed may cause offence to any person or persons. We consider this fair warning and disclaimer”