Both the OHRP and Eventfinda have justified the denial of Human Rights to the members of the National Front with the smear that we are Nazi’s and a gang.
The smearing of the National Front is typical anti-White discrimination, and we detail some of the smears that have been aimed against us by your organisations below
The New Zealand National Front has long been labeled with cliches such as “neo-nazis”, “race haters”, “white supremacists,” “criminals,” etc. They are the kinds of cliches that are also applied to the Nationalist Right worldwide, indicating that the smears have a common source and a common purpose. These smears moreover are the same whether stated by the Left, or by the globalist, corporate-controlled news media, indicating a common source and the historic alliance between Leftism and Big Money against Nationalism.
The National Front is a “gang”. This is a comment that is on an online New Zealand encyclopaedia. The entry for the National Front on Te Ara: the Encyclopedia of New Zealand, under the heading “Gangs”, states:
“The group formed in the late 1970s, based on the British National Front. In 2010 it described itself as a political party, although it was difficult to deduce what its policies were, other than homophobia, racism and patriotic nationalism”. (http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/28245/national-front)
The entry is written by Dr. Greg Newbold and Rāwiri Taonui. Dr. Newbold, an expert on gangs, should know better. Moreover nothing about the brief description is accurate. The NZNF was formed in the late 1960s by an Ashburton schoolteacher, Brian Thompson, and Mrs. Kay Hopper of Auckland, an organiser of the New Zealand branch of the League of Empire Loyalists. Why the NZNF’s policies are allegedly “difficult to deduce” is itself difficult to deduce, as the NZNF has always had a statement of policy.
Moreover, the NZNF does not have the structure of a “gang”, does not demand unlawful initiations or initiate violence on those who wish to leave; does not deal in drugs, theft, or other criminal actions, or encourage its members to acts of violence although violence.
The NF organisers always inform the police of whatever public actions are to be undertaken, and expect the police to keep order and allow peaceful protest to proceed. NF relations with the police have generally been cordial.
The NF has stood for local and national office. It has the toughest law and order policy of any party in New Zealand. What gang would advocate the death penalty for serious criminal offences?
The NZNF is involved in violence, especially against immigrant communities. This is often alleged in particular by the extreme Left, itself involved in violence. It is part of an old myth. A recent example is that of a brief You Tube presentation by anarchist Val Morse, who poses as a “peace activist” but has been involved with some of the worst violence in New Zealand politics. Amusingly, pacifist Morse was implicated as one of the Leftists at a Maori terrorist training camp in the Ureweras. In a recent commentary on the NF’s annual Flag Day in Wellington in 2014, Val Morse claims that the NF has been involved with Jewish grave desecrations and violence against the Somali community. Both allegations go back to 2004. The incidents were used as excuses for anarchists and Trotskyite-communists to mobilise hundreds of “useful idiots” to riot against the 2004 NF rally. One of the anarchist organisers, Sam Buchanan, now a Kapiti community board member, later claimed that political violence is justified and gave as a laudable example the lunatic “Black Blocs” in Europe, noted for their use of molotov cocktails.
There is no evidence or reason to believe that the NF was involved in the Jewish grave vandalism, and there is no cause for stating that the NF would encourage or condone anyone in such acts. While having no advantage to the NF, the vandalism has often been used as innuendo.
On the other hand, soon after, when the NF held its first annual Flag Day in October 2004, heavily outnumbered, they were attacked by an anarchist-led mob, who threw bottles, injuring a policeman. They Left later claimed that the bottles had been thrown by the NF from a supposed cache hidden at the University law school. However, that location was the one designated by the police at which to assemble at the conclusion of the rally, not the NF. (The Left is generally inept in their lies and the media not much better).
Furthermore, NF activities are usually only reported if confrontation is involved. Most NF activities are peaceful however, and whenever confrontation has occurred it has without exception been caused by the Left. Jonathan Milne, a leading NZ journalist, once stated to a former NF member that an NF activity would not get reported unless there was violence.
The Left claims to also to defend “ethnic” self-determination, but does not recognise that principle for White ethnics, such as the Afrikaners, who have suffered most of their history fighting imperialism and big business. Furthermore, the Left has betrayed the White working class by perversely claiming that White workers have benefited from colonialism. But the Left has no real answer to this system, which requires first of all taking away the power of the global exploiters to run the banking systems of the world. Without liberation from the money barons who exploit all races and nations, nothing else can be achieved.
Before the workers movements were taken over by Marxoids, liberals and career seekers, trades unions resisted coolie immigration. This resistance resulted in the White Australia Policy being the main plank of the Labour Party; White workers’ demonstrations in San Francisco and Canada against Asian immigration; and the revolt of the White miners on the Rand and their declaration of a White Workers’ Republic, put down violently by the State in the interests of Jewish mine owners. That is the true heritage of the Labour movement, and one that the NZNF upholds; not the Labour Party, the Communists or the Anarchists.
The NZNF is a “Nazi” organisation. This relates also to the allegation of “white supremacy”. Nazism, or more properly German National Socialism, was a German response to the condition in Europe at that time and place. While it is claimed that the NF and others are reviving Nazism for the present day, or “neo-Nazism,” there is not a historical or ideological link. While each nation has its own form of nationalism distinct to its traditions, that of the NZNF derives from the British settler heritage, and that of Dutch, Scandinavian, Polish, and others who formed the basis of NZ nationhood before being hijacked and wrecked by traitors and profiteers. White New Zealanders are an amalgam of diverse European ethnics. German National Socialism rejected Slavs as part of the European community, and sought to impose Germany upon the rest of Europe, putting its own interests before the wider interests of Europe. This reached the point of supporting reactionary regimes in Hungary and Romania rather than backing the radical nationalists movements there and elsewhere, and rejecting the Russians as “inferior”, millions of whom would have fought for Germany and a genuine new order in Europe.
Moreover, the NZNF’s nationalist ideology does not require overseas examples. Our greatest statesmen, in particular Richard John Seddon, the great social reformer William Pember Reeves, et al vigorously opposed the importation of coolie Asian labour, as did workers, farmers (who organised the White New Zealand Society) and returned servicemen, whose journals often deplored Asian immigration. The Left and their allies in big business and the news media besmirch our forefathers when they claim that NF policies are “nazi”, “simplistic”, “bigoted”, etc., because they are the values upon which New Zealand was founded, and are needed again to maintain our identity.
Furthermore, the National Front council will take disciplinary action against any National Front member using the organisation to promote Nazism.
Regards
Peter Hughes
NF